MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399153002 · doi:10.2979/vic.00065

Material Ambitions: Self-Help and Victorian Literature by Rebecca Richardson (review)

2023· article· en· W4399153002 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictorian literatureArtSociologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Material Ambitions: Self-Help and Victorian Literature by Rebecca Richardson Karen Bourrier (bio) Material Ambitions: Self-Help and Victorian Literature, by Rebecca Richardson; pp. x + 255. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2021, $37.00. Anthony Trollope is still inspiring writers today with his notoriously regimented work schedule. Allowing himself no mercy, every day he woke at 5:30 a.m. and cranked out 250 words every fifteen minutes, tabulating his output in carefully kept workbooks. In Rebecca Richardson's Material Ambitions: Self-Help and Victorian Literature, we find that although Trollope's work habits may be the best known, many Victorian writers kept similarly disciplined schedules. Harriet Martineau boiled her coffee at 7 or 7:30 a.m., worked from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m., and then had visitors, which seems reasonable until we are told she was going to bed at 1 a.m., averaging only five or five and a half hours of sleep. Dinah Craik wrote every morning, forgoing social occasions in the evening so she could be fresh for writing the next day. It was these seemingly replicable qualities of industry, perseverance, and self-denial that Samuel Smiles praised in Self-Help (1859), leading to a global industry with an estimated worth in excess of ten billion dollars today, suggesting that self-improvement is within an individual's control with straightforward habits. In Material Ambitions, Richardson uncovers the darker side of self-help, showing how this emphasis on individual goals rose in tandem with systemic ableism, colonialism, and environmental harm. An able body and mind were necessary to keep up with punishing work schedules—schedules that could and did make authors ill—and an individual's success was often predicated on harm to both Indigenous peoples and the environment. Writers including Smiles and George Lillie Craik (not coincidentally, Dinah Craik's uncle-in-law) tried to reframe ambition, long seen as criminal, as the noble quality of self-help, which would lift up not only the individual but the entire nation. The self-help narrative subsequently influenced the Victorian novel: Richardson argues that ambition reimagined as the noble quality of self-help often drives the plot. Ambition had a bad reputation as a personal trait in the early nineteenth century. For example, in Charles Dickens's works, it is often villains like Uriah Heep, Josiah Bounderby, and Bradley Headstone who are the most ambitious. The energy of these ambitious villains, however, drives the plot forward as they push the less ambitious, and thus more genteel, heroes into action. [End Page 682] Beginning with an introduction orienting the reader to the ways that Victorian fiction participates in cultural discourses about ambition through these examples from Dickens, followed by a chapter doing the same with Smiles, Richardson's methodology brings self-help literature, biographies, memoirs, nonfiction, and fiction together. Chapters 2 and 3 highlight the role that disability plays in narratives of self-help and ambition in readings of Martineau's Autobiography (1877) and Illustrations of Political Economy (1832–34), and Dinah Craik's bestseller John Halifax, Gentleman (1856). Martineau's and Craik's depictions of disabled, ill, and neurodiverse characters undermine ideals of independence and competition, theorizing an alternative to the capitalist economic system through interdependence and collaboration. In Craik's novel, the rags-to-riches tale of the eponymous protagonist is narrated through the point of view of his disabled friend. Richardson finds in this pair a submerged competition that speaks to the potential harms of ambition: Phineas registers ambition's discontents even as his nostalgic narration of John's nearly perfect life smooths them over. One of Martineau's tales in Political Economy, Weal and Woe in Garveloch, imagines individuals, including one who is neurodiverse, competing for food on a famine-struck island. The tale can be read as an apology for capitalism even while it illustrates characters' interdependence on each other and the environment. Chapters 4 and 5 expand on how ambition and self-help shape the plots of novels by William Makepeace Thackeray and Trollope, as the authors stage zero-sum games in which characters compete for a limited number of titles, inheritances, professional opportunities, and suitors. Thackeray's...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it