MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399157574 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110511

Detecting Hidden Data in Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4399157574 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erick Delenia, Yoggy Harisusilo Putra, Bayu Aditya Triwibowo, Tohari Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media Forensic Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkSteganalysisPattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionNormalization (sociology)CorrectnessPreprocessorSoftmax functionProbabilistic logicFeature (linguistics)Deep learningPayload (computing)Data miningSteganographyEmbeddingAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advancements in Deep Learning (DL) have driven the development of innovative methodologies, particularly within the domain of steganalysis for spatial domain images.Steganalysis, as the counterpart to steganography, is dedicated to uncovering concealed data within the content, making a digital image.Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), grounded in DL principles, have been influential in pushing the boundaries of this field.Despite the development of various CNN architectures that have raised the precision in detecting images with steganographic payload, current models contend with challenges related to the detectability of low payload capacities and suboptimal processes for feature learning.In response, this study introduces a novel CNN architecture to enhance steganalysis and improve the accuracy of detecting covert data in spatial domain images.The proposed model introduces a strategic integration of maximum and average pooling, a tandem approach meticulously designed to amplify the network's proficiency in capturing intricate details and multiple layers of information.Moreover, the proposed CNN architecture is structured into three principal stages: preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification.The preprocessing stage comprises Input, regular convolution layer, and Batch Normalization.The feature extraction stage employs the ReLU as a non-linear activation function based on its capacity to expedite computation by bypassing the need for exponentials and divisions.The classification stage introduces the multi-scale inception module to enhance the probabilistic feature classification.The proposed model's correctness in probabilistic classification through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) yields an AUC of 0.95, reflecting a prediction correctness of 95%.Furthermore, the results show that the proposed model outperforms the results of previous research studies in terms of accuracy and improves the existing works with a percentage ranging from 2.3 to 2.9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicDigital Media Forensic DetectionFrench-language works237,207