MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399243542 · doi:10.1080/02664763.2024.2360590

Bayesian modeling framework for optimizing pre-hospital stroke triage decisions

2024· article· en· W4399243542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Statistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsTriageBayesian probabilityStroke (engine)Computer scienceEmergency medicineMedicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. Stroke treatment optimization requires emergency medical personnel to make rapid triage decisions concerning destination hospitals that may differ in their ability to provide highly time-sensitive pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. These decisions are particularly crucial in rural areas, where transport decisions can have a large impact on treatment times - often involving a trade-off between delay in pharmaceutical therapy or a delay in endovascular thrombectomy. In this work, we explore a Bayesian modeling framework to address this decision-making process, showing how these techniques may be used to fully account for diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty. We demonstrate how these techniques can contextualize triage decision at a fine-grained spatial scale. We further show the application of this modeling approach in the US State of Iowa, using data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA), and describe potential next steps for improved triage. ABBREVIATION LVO: large vessel occlusion; non-LVO, non-large vessel occlusion; IVT: intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; EVT: endovascular thrombectomy; CSC: comprehensive stroke centers; PSC: primary stroke centers; DS: drip and ship; MS, mothership; EMS: Emergency Medical Service; BGLM: Bayesian Generalized Linear Model; BGAM: Bayesian Generalized Additive Model; BART: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees; VISTA: Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale; ASPECTS: Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score; mRS, modified Rankin score; ROCAUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ELPD: Expected Log pointwise Predictive Density; SE: Standard Error; ICA: Internal Carotid Artery; M1: Middle Cerebral Artery segment 1; M2: Middle Cerebral Artery segment 2; TIA: Transient Ischemic Attack; Cr-I: Credible Intervals; LKW: Last Known Well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it