Fusion of Google Street View, LiDAR, and Orthophoto Classifications Using Ranking Classes Based on F1 Score for Building Land-Use Type Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building land-use type classification using earth observation data is essential for urban planning and emergency management. Municipalities usually do not hold a detailed record of building land-use types in their jurisdictions, and there is a significant need for a detailed classification of this data. Earth observation data can be beneficial in this regard, because of their availability and requiring a reduced amount of fieldwork. In this work, we imported Google Street View (GSV), light detection and ranging-derived (LiDAR-derived) features, and orthophoto images to deep learning (DL) models. The DL models were trained on building land-use type data for the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The data was created using building land-use type labels from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and web scraping. Then, we classified buildings into apartment, house, industrial, institutional, mixed residential/commercial, office building, retail, and other. Three DL-derived classification maps from GSV, LiDAR, and orthophoto images were combined at the decision level using the proposed ranking classes based on the F1 score method. For comparison, the classifiers were combined using fuzzy fusion as well. The results of two independent case studies, Vancouver and Fort Worth, showed that the proposed fusion method could achieve an overall accuracy of 75%, up to 8% higher than the previous study using CNNs and the same ground truth data. Also, the results showed that while mixed residential/commercial buildings were correctly detected using GSV images, the DL models confused many houses in the GTA with mixed residential/commercial because of their similar appearance in GSV images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".