MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399339712 · doi:10.3103/s0735272723060018

Analysis of Complex Linear Periodically Time-Varying Circuits by Method of Reduced Matrix D-Trees

2023· article· en· W4399339712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadioelectronics and Communications Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix analysisMathematicsElectronic circuitAlgorithmComputer scienceApplied mathematicsPhysicsEngineeringMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper proposes the method of reduced matrix D-trees, which is an improved version of the method of matrix d-trees. This method is a further development of the application of one of the subcircuit methods, the so-called d-tree method, to the symbolic analysis of linear circuits with constant parameters The method of reduced matrix D-trees, like the d-tree method, provides a significant reduction in the required computer time for modeling circuits, which has a mathematical meaning, consisting in the bringing out of similar terms in the formed complex symbolic expressions. Since there are, in fact, many symbolic terms in such expressions, this reduction in time is due to such factoring. The method is illustrated using a model of a long line consisting of a cascade connection of a large number of elementary links. The results of the computer simulation are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it