MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399352874 · doi:10.21428/d82e957c.a04caf7d

Critical Infrastructure Asset Imaging Pipeline

2024· article· en· W4399352874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsset (computer security)Computer sciencePipeline (software)Identification (biology)Image qualityComputer visionArtificial intelligenceImage resolutionImage (mathematics)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to retrieve and analyze recent images of critical infrastructure assets is beneficial for regular monitoring, post-disaster assessment, or preparing for a service call. Given a high-quality image of an asset, several recently developed deep learning models can automatically assess the state of the infrastructure. However, obtaining such an image automatically remains an open question. Enterprise imaging initiatives, such as Google Street View, permit the viewing of road-adjacent images, given geographic coordinates. The spatial resolution of such systems is excellent, although the temporal resolution varies from months to years. We have recently forecast the emergence of on-demand imaging using instrumented vehicles that would permit more recent or frequent imaging of locations of interest. However, the challenge remains to retrieve a high-quality image of an asset of interest, free from obstructions and imaging artifacts. We here propose a pipeline to retrieve recent images of an asset given an imaging source, GPS coordinates, and an asset class. Object detection is used to automatically identify the asset of interest and to detect obstructions or imaging artifacts. If necessary, additional images are requested for surrounding locations to provide multiple views of the asset of interest culminating in an image free from artifacts. The pipeline is demonstrated using two critical infrastructure asset classes (utility poles and street lights) and two image sources (Streetview and a repository of dashcam video). Robust performance is observed, resulting in correct asset identification and imaging in 76.5% of cases (up from 54.5%), while requiring an average of 1.47 images per asset to achieve a high-quality image free from obstructions and artifacts. The proposed pipeline will be of interest to disaster response teams, utilities, and other critical infrastructure asset managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207