MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399371091 · doi:10.7155/jgaa.v28i1.2929

The Minimum Consistent Spanning Subset Problem on Trees

2024· article· en· W4399371091 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graph Algorithms and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanning treeCombinatoricsMinimum spanning treeMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a vertex-colored edge-weighted graph, the minimum consistent subset (MCS) problem asks for a minimum subset $S$ of vertices such that every vertex $v\notin S$ has the same color as its nearest neighbor in $S$. This problem is NP-complete. A recent result of Dey, Maheshwari, and Nandy (2021) gives a polynomial-time algorithm for the MCS problem on two-colored trees. A block is a maximal connected set of vertices of the same color. We introduce a variant of the MCS problem, namely the minimum consistent spanning subset problem, for which we require the set $S$ to contain a vertex from every block of the graph such that every vertex $v\notin S$ has a nearest neighbor in $S$ that is in the same block as $v$. We observe that this problem is NP-hard on general graphs. We present a polynomial-time algorithm for this problem on trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it