MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399386969 · doi:10.3390/a17060246

Minimizing Query Frequency to Bound Congestion Potential for Moving Entities at a Fixed Target Time

2024· article· en· W4399386969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceUpper and lower boundsMathematical optimizationMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a collection of entities moving continuously with bounded speed, but otherwise unpredictably, in some low-dimensional space. Two such entities encroach upon one another at a fixed time if their separation is less than some specified threshold. Encroachment, of concern in many settings such as collision avoidance, may be unavoidable. However, the associated difficulties are compounded if there is uncertainty about the precise location of entities, giving rise to potential encroachment and, more generally, potential congestion within the full collection. We adopt a model in which entities can be queried for their current location (at some cost) and the uncertainty region associated with an entity grows in proportion to the time since that entity was last queried. The goal is to maintain low potential congestion, measured in terms of the (dynamic) intersection graph of uncertainty regions, at specified (possibly all) times, using the lowest possible query cost. Previous work in the same uncertainty model addressed the problem of minimizing the congestion potential of point entities using location queries of some bounded frequency. It was shown that it is possible to design query schemes that are O(1)-competitive, in terms of worst-case congestion potential, with other, even clairvoyant query schemes (that exploit knowledge of the trajectories of all entities), subject to the same bound on query frequency. In this paper, we initiate the treatment of a more general problem with the complementary optimization objective: minimizing the query frequency, measured as the reciprocal of the minimum time between queries (granularity), while guaranteeing a fixed bound on congestion potential of entities with positive extent at one specified target time. This complementary objective necessitates quite different schemes and analyses. Nevertheless, our results parallel those of the earlier papers, specifically tight competitive bounds on required query frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it