Minimizing Query Frequency to Bound Congestion Potential for Moving Entities at a Fixed Target Time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider a collection of entities moving continuously with bounded speed, but otherwise unpredictably, in some low-dimensional space. Two such entities encroach upon one another at a fixed time if their separation is less than some specified threshold. Encroachment, of concern in many settings such as collision avoidance, may be unavoidable. However, the associated difficulties are compounded if there is uncertainty about the precise location of entities, giving rise to potential encroachment and, more generally, potential congestion within the full collection. We adopt a model in which entities can be queried for their current location (at some cost) and the uncertainty region associated with an entity grows in proportion to the time since that entity was last queried. The goal is to maintain low potential congestion, measured in terms of the (dynamic) intersection graph of uncertainty regions, at specified (possibly all) times, using the lowest possible query cost. Previous work in the same uncertainty model addressed the problem of minimizing the congestion potential of point entities using location queries of some bounded frequency. It was shown that it is possible to design query schemes that are O(1)-competitive, in terms of worst-case congestion potential, with other, even clairvoyant query schemes (that exploit knowledge of the trajectories of all entities), subject to the same bound on query frequency. In this paper, we initiate the treatment of a more general problem with the complementary optimization objective: minimizing the query frequency, measured as the reciprocal of the minimum time between queries (granularity), while guaranteeing a fixed bound on congestion potential of entities with positive extent at one specified target time. This complementary objective necessitates quite different schemes and analyses. Nevertheless, our results parallel those of the earlier papers, specifically tight competitive bounds on required query frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".