MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399422086 · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110576

Machine learning-enabled hybrid intrusion detection system with host data transformation and an advanced two-stage classifier

2024· article· en· W4399422086 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiyan Chen, Murat Şimşek, Burak Kantarcı, Mehran Bagheri, Petar Djukic

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Networks · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)Nokia (Canada)Ciena (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemHost (biology)Classifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceTransformation (genetics)Machine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) have been extensively investigated by monitoring real network traffic and analyzing suspicious activities. However, there are limitations in detecting specific types of attacks with NIDS, such as Advanced Persistent Threats (APT). Additionally, NIDS is restricted in observing complete traffic information due to encrypted traffic or a lack of authority. To address these limitations, a Host-based Intrusion Detection system (HIDS) evaluates resources in the host, including logs, files, and folders, to identify APT attacks that routinely inject malicious files into victimized nodes. In this study, a hybrid network intrusion detection system that combines NIDS and HIDS is proposed to improve intrusion detection performance. The host data undergoes a Language Processing (NLP)-based Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model from textual representation to a numerical one in order to process host data in a similar way to the network flow data through machine learning models. The feature flattening technique is applied to flatten two-dimensional host-based features that is provided by BERT into one-dimensional vectors so that host-based and network flow-based features can be processed by advanced Machine Learning (ML) models. In order to enhance HIDS effectiveness, a two-stage collaborative classifier is utilized, which applies two tiers of machine learning algorithms, binary and multi-class classifiers, to detect network intrusions. Once a binary classifier is used to detect benign samples to reduce the complexity of the original problem, the attack data are classified by a multi-class supervised learner to identify attack types. Hence, the overall performance of the two-stage collaborative model outperforms the baseline classifier, XGBoost. The proposed method is shown to generalize across two well-known datasets, CICIDS 2018 and NDSec-1. The performance of XGBoost, which represents conventional ML, is evaluated. Combining host and network features enhances attack detection performance (macro average F1 score) by 8.1% under the CICIDS 2018 dataset and 3.7% under the NDSec-1 dataset. Meanwhile, the two-stage collaborative classifier improves detection performance for most single classes, especially for DoS-LOIC-UDP and DoS-SlowHTTPTest, with improvements of 30.7% and 84.3%, respectively, when compared with the traditional ML models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer NetworksSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207