MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399426672 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3411158

Hybrid Deep Reinforcement Learning for Enhancing Localization and Communication Efficiency in RIS-Aided Cooperative ISAC Systems

2024· article· en· W4399426672 on OpenAlexaff
Prajwalita Saikia, Keshav Singh, Wan-Jen Huang, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer architectureDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we propose a novel framework that combines simultaneous localization and communication (SLAC) using a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) aided integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems. Our primary focus is on enhancing resource efficiency in such systems. We introduce Cloud Radio Access Networks (C-RAN) that facilitate collaboration between multiple base stations (BSs), enhancing cooperation benefits for both communication and sensing capabilities. To evaluate localization performance, we formulate an optimization problem to minimize the squared position error bound (SPEB) that reflects the system functional performance by optimizing the transmit beamformer, phase shift and subcarrier assignment under certain constraints. Moreover, in order to adjust the phase shift of the RIS, we propose a RIS-aided cooperative ISAC SLAC protocol. This approach utilizes the measurements collected to refine the location and velocity estimates of the agent, as well as to reconstruct the environmental map with enhanced accuracy. However, the high dimensionality of the decision space makes the problem computationally intensive and challenging to navigate using gradient-based or exhaustive search methods. To efficiently tackle these issues, we construct a framework based on Markov decision processes (MDPs) and address it by introducing a novel algorithm called hybrid deep reinforcement learning (HDRL) algorithm. We validate our proposed algorithm through various simulations, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving system performance by comparing with the baseline schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207