Newcomer Youths’ Ethical Stances in Representing War And Forced Migration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We illustrate how a group of newcomer (refugee) young women of color engaged in filmmaking using stop-motion animation to represent a story of a family becoming refugees in the face of war.We ask the following research question: How did the youth adopt, negotiate, and represent their ethical stances in telling stories of forced migration using stop-motion animation?Our analysis shows that through designing their narratives, and figural and gestural representations of marginal lives, bodies, and interactions, the youth centered axiological dimensions of representing violence, and amplified the ethical complexities experienced by families facing war and violent displacement.The youths' work offers a necessary counter-imaginary for public education in which representational work through creating animations can become a context for making visible and centering ethical and affective dimensions of their experiences of forced migration that are otherwise silenced and invisibilized by the procedurality of refugee resettlement, and in their schools in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it