Neural network approach to quasiparticle dispersions in doped antiferromagnets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Numerically simulating large, spinful, fermionic systems is of great interest in condensed matter physics. However, the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with system size renders exact quantum state parameterizations impractical. Owing to their representative power, neural networks often allow to overcome this exponential scaling. Here, we investigate the ability of neural quantum states (NQS) to represent the bosonic and fermionict − Jmodel – the high interaction limit of the Hubbard model – on various 1D and 2D lattices. Using autoregressive, tensorized recurrent neural networks (RNNs), we study ground state representations upon hole doping the half-filled system. Additionally, we propose a method to calculate quasiparticle dispersions, applicable to any network architecture or lattice geometry, and allowing to infer the low-energy physics from NQS. By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the RNN ansatz we shed light on the challenges and promises of NQS for simulating bosonic and fermionic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".