Neural network approach to quasiparticle dispersions in doped antiferromagnets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Numerically simulating large, spinful, fermionic systems is of great interest in condensed matter physics. However, the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with system size renders exact quantum state parameterizations impractical. Owing to their representative power, neural networks often allow to overcome this exponential scaling. Here, we investigate the ability of neural quantum states (NQS) to represent the bosonic and fermionic t − J model – the high interaction limit of the Hubbard model – on various 1D and 2D lattices. Using autoregressive, tensorized recurrent neural networks (RNNs), we study ground state representations upon hole doping the half-filled system. Additionally, we propose a method to calculate quasiparticle dispersions, applicable to any network architecture or lattice geometry, and allowing to infer the low-energy physics from NQS. By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the RNN ansatz we shed light on the challenges and promises of NQS for simulating bosonic and fermionic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it