Secure Similarity Queries Over Vertically Distributed Data via TEE-Enhanced Cloud Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Outsourcing big data to cloud servers has gained prominence, and growing concerns about privacy, alongside privacy-related regulations, underscore the need to encrypt data before sending them to the cloud. Nevertheless, encryption significantly hampers the query capabilities of data, particularly in the case of vertically distributed data. This paper focuses on developing secure and efficient similarity query schemes for vertically distributed data in cloud environments. As is known, current solutions are constrained by limitations in query efficiency, approximate query results, and their ability to support vertical data. To address these issues, we introduce two novel schemes: a Fast Similarity Query Scheme (FSQ) and a Non-interactive Similarity Query Scheme (NoSQ) for outsourced distributed data. In the FSQ scheme, we enhance query efficiency by designing a trusted execution environment (TEE) assisted fast secret sharing (FSS) scheme and a series of FSS-based private algorithms, enabling secure data index construction and fast similarity query processing. For the NoSQ scheme, we eliminate communication overheads by designing a TEE assisted non-interactive secret sharing (NoSS) scheme and a series of NoSS-based private algorithms. Both schemes have undergone rigorous security validation using a simulation-based real/ideal worlds model, and their efficiency has been confirmed through comprehensive experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".