MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399599679 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100306

Contemporary Review of the Methods for Rapid Ventricular Pacing During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

2024· review· en· W4399599679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyVentricleInternal medicineValve replacementPerforationCardiac tamponadeStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a widely accepted treatment strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis across all risk profiles. Pacing stimulation of the right ventricle (RV) is the conventional method used during TAVR for rapid pacing during balloon dilatation and transcatheter heart valve deployment and for the management of acute bradyarrhythmias. However, RV pacing requires additional venous access and carries a risk of RV perforation and cardiac tamponade. An alternate strategy of utilizing the stiff guidewire in the left ventricle for direct left ventricle pacing during valve deployment is increasingly being adopted, as it may reduce procedure cost, duration, and radiation exposure and potentially mitigate the risks associated with RV pacing. The current review aims to discuss contemporary rapid pacing techniques for TAVR, including their relative safety, efficiency, and outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.014
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it