MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model-Based DRL for Task Scheduling in Dynamic Environments for Cognitive Multifunction Radar

2024· article· en· W4399602444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)RadarTask (project management)Real-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The uncertainty in the radar environment brings significant challenges to task scheduling in a cognitive multifunction radar (MFR). The recent radar task scheduling approaches assume the knowledge of the environment, which is unknown in real scenarios. To achieve online task scheduling for a cognitive radar which does not need to know the dynamics of the environment, this work investigates the model-based deep reinforcement learning (DRL), which learns the model of the environment to plan for scheduling tasks. The main idea of the model-based methods is to construct an abstract Markov-decision process (MDP) model such that planning in the abstract MDP is equivalent to planning in the real environment. Here, we tailor MuZero, proposed to learn to play games, to provide the needed model. The proposed algorithm is shown to be effective in MFR task scheduling while adapting to dynamic radar environments, without any a priori knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207