MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399759571 · doi:10.1080/01691864.2024.2415084

Real-time, dense UAV mapping by leveraging monocular depth prediction with monocular-inertial SLAM

2024· article· en· W4399759571 on OpenAlexaff
Yassine Habib, Panagiotis Papadakis, Cédric Le Barz, Antoine Fagette, Tiago Gonçalves, Cédric Buche

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Robotics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsThales (Canada)
FundersAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
KeywordsMonocularArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingInertial frame of referenceComputer graphics (images)RobotPhysicsMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a dense and metric 3D mapping pipeline designed for embedded operation on-board UAVs, by loosely coupling deep neural networks trained to infer dense depth single images with a SLAM system that restores metric scale from sparse depth. In contrast to computationally restrictive approaches that leverage multiple views, we propose a highly efficient, single-view approach without sacrificing 3D mapping performance. This enables real-time construction of a global 3D voxel map by iterative fusion of the rescaled dense depth maps obtained via raycasting from the estimated camera poses. Quantitative and qualitative experimentations of our framework in challenging environmental conditions show comparable or superior performance with respect to state-of-the-art approaches via a better effectiveness-efficiency trade-off.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced RoboticsSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207