MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399779471 · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105528

Application of polyelectrolytes for contaminant removal and recovery during water and wastewater treatment: A critical review

2024· review· en· W4399779471 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Process Engineering · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyelectrolyteWastewaterWater treatmentSewage treatmentChemistryEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of polymeric characteristics and electrolyte behaviour endow aqueous polyelectrolytes with a strong potential for use in water and wastewater treatment. A correct and effective application of polyelectrolytes or polyelectrolyte complexes can remove different types of contaminants from aqueous solutions efficiently. Polyelectrolytes can be utilized directly as a water treatment material or indirectly as additives or modifiers to improve the effectiveness of existing water treatment processes. Previous reviews on this general research topic focused mainly on the function of polyelectrolytes in coagulation and flocculation processes, but they neglected other potential functions during water treatment processes. The current review introduces the typical polyelectrolytes utilized in water processing, including their properties and their interaction with contaminant species in water, and then summarizes and reviews the various unique applications of polyelectrolytes in water processing, including the polyelectrolyte enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) process, the application of polyelectrolytes to efficiently functionalize membranes and adsorbents, and the formation of polyelectrolyte-surfactant aggregates (PSAs) to recover metallic species from water. Finally, the challenges and opportunities for future investigation of the application of polyelectrolytes in water processing and treatment are discussed. • Typical polyelectrolytes utilized in water processing are summarized. • Various unique applications of polyelectrolytes in water processing are reviewed. • PEUF process, modification of membranes and adsorbents, and formation of PSAs to recover metals are emphasized. • The challenges and opportunities for future investigation of the application of polyelectrolytes are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it