The Role of Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Stress Perception and Sensory Preference within Virtual Environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the individual and combined effects of auditory and visual stimuli on stress perception within Virtual Reality (VR). The exploration utilized physiological measures as Blood Volume Pulse (BVP), psychological assessments like the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Short Form (STAI-S), and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Participants were immersed in two contrasting VR environments. The first environment was a tranquil forest, whereas the second scene was a chaotic city. Participants’ stress levels under different sensory conditions were assessed methodically by switching between congruent and incongruent audio-visual experiences. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of sensory impacts on stress perception in VR environments and to the development of individualized VR experiences specific to individuals’ sensory preferences. While the findings suggest some individual variability in stress responses, particularly in audio versus visual stimulus dominance, these observations were not statistically significant, indicating a need for further exploration into personalized sensory experiences in VR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it