Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unsupervised feature selection (UFS) aims to learn an indicator matrix relying on some characteristics of the high-dimensional data to identify the features to be selected. However, traditional unsupervised methods perform only at the feature level, i.e., they directly select useful features by feature ranking. Such methods do not pay any attention to the interaction information with other tasks such as classification, which severely degrades their feature selection performance. In this article, we propose an UFS method which also takes into account the classification level, and selects features that perform well both in clustering and classification. To achieve this, we design a bi-level spectral feature selection (BLSFS) method, which combines classification level and feature level. More concretely, at the classification level, we first apply the spectral clustering to generate pseudolabels, and then train a linear classifier to obtain the optimal regression matrix. At the feature level, we select useful features via maintaining the intrinsic structure of data in the embedding space with the learned regression matrix from the classification level, which in turn guides classifier training. We utilize a balancing parameter to seamlessly bridge the classification and feature levels together to construct a unified framework. A series of experiments on 12 benchmark datasets are carried out to demonstrate the superiority of BLSFS in both clustering and classification performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it