MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399889904 · doi:10.18280/i2m.230305

Enhancing the Performance of CUSUM Schemes for Process Mean Monitoring: A Generalized Fast Initial Response Approach

2024· article· en· W4399889904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCUSUMProcess (computing)Computer scienceStatisticsEconometricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control charts have gained increasing attention as a feedback process monitoring technique in recent times.Among them, CUSUM schemes have proven to be effective for monitoring processes with small or moderate sustained mean shifts.However, the detection ability of CUSUM schemes is often slow during the initial process setup due to the constant control limits.To address this limitation, the fast initial response (FIR) or headstart feature has been commonly employed to enhance the scheme's performance at process startup.Additionally, the dynamic nature of real-world challenges calls for a more sensitive CUSUM scheme capable of rapidly identifying small disturbances in a process.In this paper, we propose the utilization of a generalized FIR feature to improve the performance of CUSUM schemes for monitoring process means.By incorporating the generalized FIR feature, we enhance the control limits of the CUSUM scheme, thereby improving its sensitivity to smaller sustained shifts in a process.We assess the efficiency of the proposed system by comparing how well it performs against existing alternatives, using the average run length (ARL), median run length (MDRL), and standard deviation average run length (SDRL) measures.The ARL performance comparison results indicate that the suggested approach shows faster detection of small to moderate sustained alterations in a particular process.Therefore, this method is especially useful for monitoring processes that have observations collected at widely spaced time intervals, such as hourly, daily, or weekly measures, where it is believed that any changes over time will be minor or moderate.To validate the practical viability of our proposed scheme, we showcase its successful implementation in real-world scenarios, utilizing data sets acquired from a beverage bottling company and a petroleum refinery laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it