MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399908098 · doi:10.21105/joss.06598

Delta-Rice: A HDF5 Compression Plugin optimized forDigitized Detector Data

2024· article· en· W4399908098 on OpenAlexaff
David G. Mathews, C. B. Crawford, S. Baeßler, N. Birge, L. J. Broussard, Frank Gonzalez, L. Hayen, Aaron Jezghani, R. Mammei, August Mendelsohn, Glenn Randall, Grant Riley, Danielle Schaper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersWorkforce Development for Teachers and ScientistsNuclear PhysicsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceThroughputDetectorFilter (signal processing)Plug-inData compressionCoding (social sciences)Computer hardwareOperating systemArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delta-Rice is an HDF5 (The HDF Group et al., 2020) filter plugin that was developed to compress digitized detector signals recorded by the Nab experiment (Fry et al., 2019), a fundamental neutron physics experiment. This is a two-step process where incoming data is passed through a pre-processing filter and then compressed with Rice coding. A routine for determining the optimal pre-processing filter for a dataset is provided along with an example GPU deployment. When applied to data collected by the Nab data acquisition system, this method produced output files 29% their initial size, and was able to do so with an average read/write throughput in excess of 2 GB/s on a single CPU. Compared to the widely used Gzip compression routine, Delta-Rice reduces the file size by 33% more with over an order of magnitude increase in read/write throughput. Delta-Rice is available on CPU to users through the HDF5 library.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207