Harnessing Broadcast Receivers for Classification of Android Malware Threats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing number of malicious attacks, the way how to detect and classify malicious apps has drawn attention in mobile technology market. In this paper, we proposed a classification model to seek and track malware Apps broadcast receivers in such devices. To identify the family of apps, static features of each app was extracted and a novel deterministic classifier is employed to categorize malware apps. With such, we can act against malware of known family, since we understand its functions, and prevent it from spreading out in larger scale, affecting extensively our society. Detailed description of the classification model is provided, as well the core technologies of this novel malicious android applications’ model are presented. From experiments performed on a set of Android-based malware apps, we observe that the proposed classification model achieves highest accuracy, true-positive rate, false-positive rate, precision, recall, f-measure in comparison to other methods implemented in published experiments. The proposed classification model is promising since the average accuracy reaches an average of 97.31% and can effectively be applied to Android malware categorization, providing early detection of the capabilities of malware and the prospect of warning users of threatens ahead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it