MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399920617 · doi:10.34190/eccws.23.1.2101

Feature Engineering for a MIL-STD-1553B LSTM Autoencoder Anomaly Detector

2024· article· en· W4399920617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaAir Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceAnomaly detectionFeature engineeringDetectorPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MIL-STD-1553B data bus protocol is used in both civilian and military aircraft to enable communications between subsystems. These interconnected subsystems are responsible for core services such as communications, flow of instrument data and aircraft control. With aircraft modernization, threat vectors are introduced through increased inter-connectivity internal and external to the aircraft. The resulting potential for exploitation introduces a requirement for an intrusion detection capability in order to maintain the integrity, availability and reliability of data transmitted using the MIL-STD-1553B protocol, safety of the aircraft and overall, to achieve mission assurance. Research in recent years has investigated signature, statistical and machine learning based solutions to detect attacks on MIL-STD-1553B buses. Of the different techniques, those based on machine learning have shown extremely good results. The aim of this research is to improve the performance of an existing Long Short-Term Memory Auto-Encoder by refining the feature engineering phase of its pipeline. The improvement in the detector’s overall effectiveness was accomplished through feature engineering focused on feature generation and selection. Five different attack datasets were used as the starting point, consisting of four different denial of service attacks and one data integrity attack. From initial feature extraction of 155 features, two feature generation techniques were employed to create over 38,000 features as a starting point. Using five different MIL-STD-1553B datasets and three feature selection techniques, fifteen different Long Short-Term Memory Auto-Encoder models were created, trained and evaluated using common performance metrics and compared to those of the original anomaly detector. This research demonstrated marked performance improvement achieved by the feature engineering refinements made in comparison to those of the original model. Equally important, this research also showed a significant reduction in the number of features required to achieve this performance gain. In the context of miliary air operations, the ability to improve detection capabilities with less data is important to the technical solutions that contribute to the achievement of cyber mission assurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it