Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Uncertain Cost
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When a conflict occurs, the disputants involved and interested third parties usually expect to reach the desired equilibrium. To achieve this goal, inverse graph model for conflict resolution is an effective way to make the state of interest an equilibrium by ascertaining the required preferences. However, specifying crisp cost or effort of changing preferences over states can be challenging for decision makers (DMs) and third parties. As a result, a new inverse preference optimization model using interval optimization is introduced into the graph model by considering the uncertain cost of preference adjustment. First, the preference adjustment cost with uncertainty is formulated using interval number. Then, pessimistic preference ordering and DMs’ degrees of risk tolerance are utilized to compare cost intervals. After that, an inverse preference optimization model with uncertain adjustment cost is established. Finally, an illustrative example of the bulk water export conflict in Canada is presented to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it