MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399997772 · doi:10.25726/o8584-1761-8941-x

Problems and prospects for the development of educational programs in oil and gas universities based on international experience

2024· article· ru· W4399997772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement of Education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFossil fuelEngineering ethicsPolitical scienceEngineering managementEngineeringMathematics educationPsychologyWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В данной статье представлен всесторонний анализ проблем и перспектив развития образовательных программ в нефтегазовых вузах, основанный на международном опыте. Актуальность темы исследования обусловлена необходимостью модернизации образовательного процесса в нефтегазовой отрасли с учетом глобальных тенденций и вызовов. Цель работы заключается в выявлении ключевых проблем и определении потенциальных направлений совершенствования образовательных программ в нефтегазовых университетах. Методология исследования базируется на комплексном подходе, включающем в себя анализ статистических данных, изучение международного опыта, проведение экспертных интервью и опросов среди 150 представителей нефтегазовых компаний и 200 преподавателей из 15 ведущих университетов России, США, Великобритании, Канады и Норвегии. Применялись методы сравнительного анализа, синтеза, индукции и дедукции. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о наличии ряда системных проблем в образовательных программах нефтегазовых вузов, таких как недостаточная практикоориентированность (отмечена 78% респондентов), слабая интеграция с индустрией (69%), дефицит квалифицированных преподавательских кадров (54%), отставание в области цифровизации и использования современных технологий (61%). Определены перспективные направления развития, включающие усиление партнерства университетов с нефтегазовыми компаниями (поддержано 87% экспертов), внедрение инновационных образовательных методик (82%), привлечение зарубежных специалистов (71%), развитие программ академической мобильности (65%). Предложена концептуальная модель модернизации образовательных программ, основанная на лучших международных практиках и предполагающая комплексную трансформацию образовательной среды нефтегазовых вузов. Полученные результаты имеют практическую значимость для руководства нефтегазовых университетов, образовательных управленцев и представителей индустрии, заинтересованных в повышении качества подготовки специалистов для нефтегазовой отрасли. Дальнейшие исследования могут быть направлены на детальную разработку и апробацию предложенной модели в условиях конкретных университетов. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the problems and prospects for the development of educational programs in oil and gas universities, based on international experience. The relevance of the research topic is due to the need to modernize the educational process in the oil and gas industry, taking into account global trends and challenges. The purpose of the work is to identify key problems and identify potential areas for improving educational programs at oil and gas universities. The research methodology is based on an integrated approach that includes the analysis of statistical data, the study of international experience, expert interviews and surveys among 150 representatives of oil and gas companies and 200 teachers from 15 leading universities in Russia, the United States, Great Britain, Canada and Norway. Methods of comparative analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction were used. The results of the study indicate the presence of a number of systemic problems in the educational programs of oil and gas universities, such as insufficient practice orientation (78% of respondents noted), weak integration with industry (69%), a shortage of qualified teaching staff (54%), lagging in the field of digitalization and the use of modern technologies (61%). Promising areas of development have been identified, including strengthening the partnership of universities with oil and gas companies (87% of experts supported), the introduction of innovative educational methods (82%), the involvement of foreign specialists (71%), the development of academic mobility programs (65%). A conceptual model for the modernization of educational programs based on the best international practices and involving a comprehensive transformation of the educational environment of oil and gas universities is proposed. The results obtained are of practical importance for the management of oil and gas universities, educational managers and industry representatives interested in improving the quality of training specialists for the oil and gas industry. Further research can be directed to the detailed development and testing of the proposed model in the context of specific universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it