CTM-YOLOv8n: A Lightweight Pedestrian Traffic-Sign Detection and Recognition Model with Advanced Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic-sign detection and recognition (TSDR) is crucial to avoiding harm to pedestrians, especially children, from intelligent connected vehicles and has become a research hotspot. However, due to motion blurring, partial occlusion, and smaller sign sizes, pedestrian TSDR faces increasingly significant challenges. To overcome these difficulties, a CTM-YOLOv8n model is proposed based on the YOLOv8n model. With the aim of extracting spatial features more efficiently and making the network faster, the C2f Faster module is constructed to replace the C2f module in the head, which applies filters to only a few input channels while leaving the remaining ones untouched. To enhance small-sign detection, a tiny-object-detection (TOD) layer is designed and added to the first C2f layer in the backbone. Meanwhile, the seventh Conv layer, eighth C2f layer, and connected detection head are deleted to reduce the quantity of model parameters. Eventually, the original CIoU is replaced by the MPDIoU, which is better for training deep models. During experiments, the dataset is augmented, which contains the choice of categories ‘w55’ and ‘w57’ in the TT100K dataset and a collection of two types of traffic signs around the schools in Tianjin. Empirical results demonstrate the efficacy of our model, showing enhancements of 5.2% in precision, 10.8% in recall, 7.0% in F1 score, and 4.8% in mAP@0.50. However, the number of parameters is reduced to 0.89M, which is only 30% of the YOLOv8n model. Furthermore, the proposed CTM-YOLOv8n model shows superior performance when tested against other advanced TSDR models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".