MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400150361 · doi:10.1007/979-8-8688-0324-6_9

Design System Fundamentals

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400150361 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Thinking · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDesign Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsGeorgetown Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before there was the Design System, there were graphic standards. Had you worked for or with such companies as IBM, Apple, FedEx, or Citigroup prior to 1990, you would be handed a book outlining the company’s graphic standards. That book told you where a logo was to be placed on everything from business cards to print ads. Included were typographic standards defining what font to use and when to use the various weights and sizes. In many cases, that typographic standard included a custom font. For example, prior to 2001, Apple used a customized version of Garamond and then gradually switched to today’s Myriad Pro. IBM is affectionately known as “Big Blue” for a reason. IBM’s corporate color is Pantone’s PMS 2718 C, and the Hexadecimal version is #006699. The Citigroup red umbrella logo uses PMS 485 C, and the Hexadecimal version is #DB230B and its corporate font is Interstate, where the lowercase "t" has been modified to resemble an umbrella handle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it