MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400281194 · doi:10.32473/flairs.37.1.135320

Developing a predictive model using multivariate analysis and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to assess corrosion degradation in mining pipeline thickness.

2024· article· en· W4400281194 on OpenAlexafffund
Kalidou Moussa Sow, Nadia Ghazzali

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInnovation and Economic Development Trois Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPipeline (software)Degradation (telecommunications)Multivariate statisticsLong short term memoryTerm (time)CorrosionComputer scienceMultivariate analysisArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningMaterials scienceMetallurgyArtificial neural networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipeline corrosion has significant impacts on the human,economic, and natural environment. To help betterdetect and prevent it over time, in this paper, we proposea multivariate approach using machine learning.More precisely, we propose to study the evolution ofthe thickness of the mining pipeline using a multivariateapproach and to implement a predictive model usingthe Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) artificial neuralnetwork. Indeed, LSTM is a specific recurrent neuralnetwork (RNN) architecture designed to model temporalsequences. The proposed predictive model achievedan accuracy of 80% and a loss of 0.01 and was able topredict variations in eight thickness measurements overone hundred days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society ConferenceSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207