MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400281194 · doi:10.32473/flairs.37.1.135320

Developing a predictive model using multivariate analysis and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to assess corrosion degradation in mining pipeline thickness.

2024· article· en· W4400281194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInnovation and Economic Development Trois Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPipeline (software)Degradation (telecommunications)Multivariate statisticsLong short term memoryTerm (time)CorrosionComputer scienceMultivariate analysisArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningMaterials scienceMetallurgyArtificial neural networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipeline corrosion has significant impacts on the human,economic, and natural environment. To help betterdetect and prevent it over time, in this paper, we proposea multivariate approach using machine learning.More precisely, we propose to study the evolution ofthe thickness of the mining pipeline using a multivariateapproach and to implement a predictive model usingthe Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) artificial neuralnetwork. Indeed, LSTM is a specific recurrent neuralnetwork (RNN) architecture designed to model temporalsequences. The proposed predictive model achievedan accuracy of 80% and a loss of 0.01 and was able topredict variations in eight thickness measurements overone hundred days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it