Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supervised training of machine learning models heavily relies on accurate annotations. However, data annotation, such as in the case of time-series signals, poses a labor-intensive challenge. Here, we present a new annotation software, Annotation of Time-series Events (ANNOTE), to handle longitudinal, time-series signals as in highly complex physiological events. ANNOTE offers flexibility and adaptability to streamline the annotation process through an intuitive user interface, effectively meeting diverse annotation needs. Users can annotate regions of interest with precision down to a single data point. ANNOTE presents a useful tool to support researchers in handling time-series biomedical data for downstream machine-learning analyses. • Intuitive user interface and interactive visualizations. • Visualization of multi-channel data signals. • Selection and annotation of region of interests with precision down to a single data point. • Simple navigation to each annotated event using a clear and organized tabular display.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it