MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400350341 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102092

Non-thermal plasma technology for air pollution control and bacterial deactivation

2024· article· en· W4400350341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Physical Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonthermal plasmaPlasmaEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionPollutionEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiologyPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exploration of innovative technologies for effective pollution control is crucial for both environmental and human health. Non-thermal plasma has emerged as a promising solution due to its dynamic nature and versatile applications. This work investigates the role of non-thermal plasma in air pollution control, covering the decomposition of various volatile organic compounds, including toluene, formaldehyde, ethanol, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfur dioxide, as well as the deactivation of E. coli. The findings revealed that toluene, formaldehyde, and ethanol reach more than 90% decomposition, while hydrogen sulfide undergoes a complete conversion. Meanwhile, the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency stands at 27%. Additionally, E. coli deactivation in fixed feeding mode demonstrates robust bactericidal capabilities within 30 min, while continuous feeding for 4 h achieves 100% bacterial inactivation. These quantitative outcomes provide insights for optimizing non-thermal plasma systems in pollution control, environmental remediation, and sterilization processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it