MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400350341 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102092

Non-thermal plasma technology for air pollution control and bacterial deactivation

2024· article· en· W4400350341 on OpenAlexafffund
Wenping Li, Avinash Alagumalai, Zhaofei Li, Hua Song

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Physical Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonthermal plasmaPlasmaEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionPollutionEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiologyPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exploration of innovative technologies for effective pollution control is crucial for both environmental and human health. Non-thermal plasma has emerged as a promising solution due to its dynamic nature and versatile applications. This work investigates the role of non-thermal plasma in air pollution control, covering the decomposition of various volatile organic compounds, including toluene, formaldehyde, ethanol, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfur dioxide, as well as the deactivation of E. coli . The findings revealed that toluene, formaldehyde, and ethanol reach more than 90% decomposition, while hydrogen sulfide undergoes a complete conversion. Meanwhile, the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency stands at 27%. Additionally, E. coli deactivation in fixed feeding mode demonstrates robust bactericidal capabilities within 30 min, while continuous feeding for 4 h achieves 100% bacterial inactivation. These quantitative outcomes provide insights for optimizing non-thermal plasma systems in pollution control, environmental remediation, and sterilization processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports Physical ScienceSame topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207