Multi-view subspace clustering based on multi-order neighbor diffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multi-view subspace clustering (MVC) intends to separate out samples via integrating the complementary information from diverse views. In MVC, since the structural information in the graph is crucial to the graph learning, most of the existing algorithms construct the superficial graph from the original data by directly measuring the similarity between the first-order complementary nearest neighbors. However, the information provided by the superficial graph structure would be influenced by contaminated or absent samples. To address this problem, in the proposed method, the higher-order complementary neighbor graphs are exploited to discover the latent structural information between the samples, and fusing the latent structural information across different orders to achieve the MVC. Specifically, the higher-order neighbor graphs under different views are leveraged to estimate the missing samples. Then, to integrate the neighbor graphs of different orders, the multi-order neighbor diffusion fusion is proposed. Nevertheless, the above problem of diffusion fusion is an intractable non-convex issue. Thus, to address it, the multi-order neighbor diffusion fusion is considered as a combination problem of the solution under different order, and the heuristic algorithm is leveraged to solve it. In this way, not only the data representation under different view and also the neighbor structure under different order can be diffused under a joint optimization framework, thus the consistency and integral information among various perspectives and orders can be utilized effectively and simultaneously. Experiments on both incomplete and complete multi-view dataset demonstrate the convincingness of the high-order neighborhood structure based subspace clustering scheme by comparing with the existing approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".