MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400443952 · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100756

Experimental investigation of camless air engine to improve performance by the novel controller and exhaust pressure predicting technique

2024· article· en· W4400443952 on OpenAlexaff
Nikhilkumar Jagjivanbhai Chotai, Motwani Karan, Vivek Patel, Vimal Savsani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermofluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsInnovation Initiatives Ontario North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringExhaust gas recirculationController (irrigation)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringInternal combustion engine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the face of the climate crisis, hike in prices of petroleum products, and limited gasoline sources, it is imperative to explore the possible opportunities in the field of energy transformation technology. Non-conventional and non-hazardous green fuel-air engine technology has proven to have a promising future in propulsion technology. In the air engine, the camless mechanism has created scope for research by replacement option of cam-follower with variable valve train (solenoid valve), which can be controlled electronically. In this paper, work is done on the operational parameters (i.e., cycle time, flow rate, and crank position) of camless air engines and proposed a controlling mechanism with experimental results to improve the system's efficiency. Control of intake duration maximizes the utilization of input compressed air power by allowing the optimum amount of air to expand fully. The novel controller was designed, developed, and tested, which controls the engine intake duration by estimating exhaust pressure. A prototype model was built with an electronic control circuit and pneumatic system, which records signals of operational parameters with the help of feedback sensors and controls the engine's intake duration at different operating pressure ranging from 3 to 6.5 bar. Experiments were conducted, and the results of two cycles were compared, case-I, where compressed air is continuously supplied from 0° to 170° of crank angle, and case-II controlled cycle, which controls intake duration by estimating exhaust pressure. Results show the average efficiency improvement of 11.91 % in case-II compared to case-I and also improvement in work done and RPM (Revolution per Minute) of the cycle. Thus, the control system in a camless air engine increases the feasibility of the air engine as one of the propulsion technologies in a city vehicle and even in the Compressed Air Energy Storage System (CAES).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ThermofluidsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207