MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400459006 · doi:10.21105/joss.06720

Catalyst: a Python JIT compiler for auto-differentiablehybrid quantum programs

2024· article· en· W4400459006 on OpenAlexaff
David Ittah, Ali Asadi, Erick Ochoa Lopez, Sergei Mironov, Samuel Banning, Romain Moyard, Mai Jacob Peng, Josh Izaac

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsXanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)CompilerProgramming languageComputer scienceDifferentiable functionMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catalyst is a software package for capturing Python-based hybrid quantum programs (that is, programs that contain both quantum and classical instructions), and just-in-time (JIT) compiling them down to an MLIR and LLVM representation and generating binary code.As a result, Catalyst enables the ability to rapidly prototype quantum algorithms in Python alongside efficient compilation, optimization, and execution of the program on classical and quantum accelerators.In addition, Catalyst allows for advanced quantum programming features essential for fault-tolerant hardware support and advanced algorithm design, such as mid-circuit measurement with arbitrary post-processing, support for classical control flow in and around quantum algorithms, built-in measurement statistics, and hardware-compatible automatic differentiation (AD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207