MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400485340 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc120-16

Approximation Algorithms for the Submodular Hitting Set Problem

2024· article· en· W4400485340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSubmodular set functionSet (abstract data type)AlgorithmApproximation algorithmComputer scienceSet functionMathematical optimizationSet cover problemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the submodular hitting set problem (SHSP), which is a variant of the hitting set problem. In the SHSP, we are given a supergraph H = ( V , C ) and a nonnegative submodular function on the set 2 V . The objective is to determine a vertex subset to cover all hyperedges such that the cost of submodular covering is minimized. Our main work is to present a rounding algorithm and a primal-dual algorithm respectively for the SHSP and prove that they both have the approximation ratio k , where k is the maximum number of vertices in all hyperedges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it