The Construction of Fuzzy Prediction Model of Stock Price Rise and Fall Based on Machine Learning Technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the use of smart data analysis method to predict the stock price is financial technology; important issues in the field of finch. However, there are many technical indicators and human subjective factors will affect the stock price forecast, so we must effectively grasp the important influence indicators to improve the accuracy of stock price forecast. Therefore, this study uses four machine learning algorithms to predict and analyze the stock price fluctuation through the screening process of technical indicators, and then selects the important technical indicators. In addition, due to the uncertainty and fuzziness of the attributes of technical indicators and human subjective judgment, this study uses the fuzzy inference method to construct the fuzzy inference system to predict the rise and fall of stock price, and proposes the prediction method of the range of the rise and fall of stock price. Finally, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the stock price data of three companies. The results show that the accuracy of stock price forecast is more than 82.13%, and the average accuracy of stock price forecast is more than 83%. Therefore, the fuzzy inference prediction system proposed in this study not only has the theoretical basis, but also can effectively predict the trend and range of stock price, which has practical value and contribution to investors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it