MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400496159 · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100813

Temporality of online reactions to fictional characters’ death

2024· article· en· W4400496159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEntertainment Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalityCyberspaceContext (archaeology)StorytellingVisual artsMultimediaHistoryComputer scienceArtWorld Wide WebLiteratureThe InternetNarrativeEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the digital era, online reactions to broadcast media are an important feature of audience engagement. Although central, the question of the temporality of audience online reactions has been understudied. We investigate this question by exploring the temporal patterns of online reactions to fictional characters’ deaths. More than 3,500 forum reactions to Game of Thrones characters’ deaths were collected over 5 years. Temporal patterns of reactions to expected deaths displayed more long-term patterns, while reactions to unexpected deaths displayed more spontaneous patterns. These results further our understanding of death reactions’ temporality in cyberspace, in a multimedia and transmedia storytelling context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it