Quasi Group Role Assignment With Agent Satisfaction in Self-Service Spatiotemporal Crowdsourcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quasi group role assignment (QGRA) presents a novel social computing model designed to address the burgeoning domain of self-service spatiotemporal crowdsourcing (SSC), specifically for tackling the photographing to make money problem (PMMP). Nevertheless, the application of QGRA in practical scenarios encounters a significant bottleneck. QGRA provides optimal assignment strategies under conditions where both the number of crowdsourced tasks and workers remain stable. However, real-world crowdsourcing applications may necessitate the phased integration of new tasks. With the rapid increase in the number of tasks, a set of residual tasks inevitably exists that are difficult to complete. To maximize the completion of crowdsourced tasks, workers may be assigned low-yield or even unprofitable tasks. Given the reluctance of crowdsourcing workers to be overstretched for these tasks, along with the inherent characteristics of self-service crowdsourcing tasks, this can lead to the failure of the assignment scheme. To tackle the identified challenges, this article proposes the QGRA with agent satisfaction (QGRAAS) method. Initially, it sheds light on a creative satisfaction filtering algorithm (SFA), which is engineered to perform optimal task assignments while actively optimizing the profitability of crowdsourcing workers. This approach ensures the satisfaction of workers, thereby fostering their loyalty to the platform. Concurrently, in response to the phased changes in the crowdsourcing environment, this article incorporates the concept of bonus incentives. This aids decision-makers in achieving a tradeoff between the operational costs and task completion rates. The robustness and practicality of the proposed solutions are confirmed through simulation experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".