Towards Decolonization and Indigenization of Historical Knowledge and Practices at University: A Collaboration Between a History Museum and an Undergraduate History Course
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter examines the role a history museum, committed to the process of Indigenisation, can play in the academic training of university students enrolled in a Canadian history course. The qualitative case study addresses the possibilities inherent in an educational partnership between the McCord Stewart Museum and a course in the history of Indigenous peoples in Canada offered at the Université du Québec à Montréal. Primary findings tend to reveal that these collaborations may not only be effective in supporting students' formal learning and historical consciousness but may equally contribute to the enhancement of both teaching practices and museum education. Additionally, the research has set forth the complex and continuous negotiation required to tackle Indigenous perspectives within settlers' ways of doing and assessing. Pedagogically oriented collaborations between the museum and university may engender significant and multidimensional changes in all parties involved and contribute toward a decolonised and Indigenised Quebec society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it