MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400589459 · doi:10.1386/9781789389166_9

Starvation Plates: A Fine Art Example of Educational Interpretation Design

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400589459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtwork scholarship · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)StarvationComputer scienceBiologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For this article, an exhibit of a work of art by Canadian Cree artist Kent Monkman serves as a visual art exemplar of educational interpretation design. Museum designers use this strategy within an exhibition to encourage museum visitors to purposefully consider and actively interpret museum objects. Use of this and similar design strategies is increasing as museum design practice is moving away from an emphasis on product design in favour of a growing concern for the use of design to benefit the visitor. Not surprisingly, in these cases, interpretation design often takes on an exceptional educational character. For these reasons, I argue that good interpretation design is indeed educational in that it contributes to the quality of visitors’ museum experiences and facilitates meaningful interpretations of works of art. These activities are certainly at the core of the learning experience intended when planning exhibition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it