Estimated Incidence of Hospitalizations Attributable to RSV Infection Among Adults in Ontario, Canada, Between 2013 and 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adult respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) burden is underestimated due to non-specific symptoms, limited standard-of-care and delayed testing, reduced diagnostic test sensitivity-particularly when using single diagnostic specimen-when compared to children, and variable test sensitivity based on the upper airway specimen source. We estimated RSV-attributable hospitalization incidence among adults aged ≥ 18 years in Ontario, Canada, using a retrospective time-series model-based approach. METHODS: The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences data repository provided weekly numbers of hospitalizations (from 2013 to 2019) for respiratory, cardiovascular, and cardiorespiratory disorders. The number of hospitalizations attributable to RSV was estimated using a quasi-Poisson regression model that considered probable overdispersion and was based on periodic and aperiodic time trends and viral activity. As proxies for viral activity, weekly counts of RSV and influenza hospitalizations in children under 2 years and adults aged 60 years and over, respectively, were employed. Models were stratified by age and risk group. RESULTS: In patients ≥ 60 years, RSV-attributable incidence rates were high for cardiorespiratory hospitalizations (range [mean] in 2013-2019: 186-246 [215] per 100,000 person-years, 3‒4% of all cardiorespiratory hospitalizations), and subgroups including respiratory hospitalizations (144-192 [167] per 100,000 person-years, 5‒7% of all respiratory hospitalizations) and cardiovascular hospitalizations (95-126 [110] per 100,000 person-years, 2‒3% of all cardiovascular hospitalizations). RSV-attributable cardiorespiratory hospitalization incidence increased with age, from 14-18 [17] hospitalizations per 100,000 person-years (18-49 years) to 317-411 [362] per 100,000 person-years (≥ 75 years). CONCLUSIONS: Estimated RSV-attributable respiratory hospitalization incidence among people ≥ 60 years in Ontario, Canada, is comparable to other incidence estimates from high-income countries, including model-based and pooled prospective estimates. Recently introduced RSV vaccines could have a substantial public health impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".