Exploring the role of e-learning, digital leadership and digital innovation behavior on schools' performance during society 5.0 era
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this digital era, all human activities have moved towards digital. The digital era has provided significant changes in all aspects of life, one of which is the educational aspect. Digital technology has opened up new education opportunities but also presents challenges that must be faced. Almost all sectors, including education in the industry 5.0 era, have digitized, namely by utilizing sophisticated information technology. Era Society 5.0, is an era that will make it easier for human life to interact and transition to the digital era. Thus, the use of digital technology for every aspect of life, especially the education sector, is very necessary since it will reflect the level of competitiveness of a country. This research aims to analyze the relationship between e-learning and performance, digital leadership and performance, and the relationship between digital innovation and performance. This type of research uses quantitative research methods. The population in this research is all high school teachers who have used e-learning platforms and have carried out digital innovation. The sampling technique used in this research was a simple random sampling technique and the total sample of respondents from this research was 489 teachers. The type of data used in this research is primary data and the data search tool used is an online questionnaire using a Likert scale. The data analysis is to use structural equation modelling. The results show that e-learning had a positive and significant relationship with performance, digital leadership had a positive and significant relationship with performance and digital innovation had a positive and significant relationship with performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it