MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sejarah banjir Bekasi 1924-2002

2023· article· id· W4400692294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSejarah dan Budaya Jurnal Sejarah Budaya dan Pengajarannya · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater and Land Management
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Banjir dan Bekasi sudah menjadi dua hal yang hampir mustahil dipisahkan. Sejarah mencatat banjir sudah terjadi di Bekasi sejak masa Kerajaan Tarumanegara pada abad ke-5 Masehi yang dituliskan dalam Prasasti Tugu. Pada masa kolonial, banjir di Bekasi selalu melanda setiap musim penghujan tiba. Kondisi ini terus berlanjut hingga pasca Reformasi, bahkan saat ini. Seringnya banjir melanda Bekasi membuat pemerintah yang berkuasa saat itu harus menemukan cara untuk melakukan penanggulangan banjir yang melanda. Tulisan ini berusaha mendeskripsikan sejarah banjir sejak masa kolonial dan mengetahui bagaimana upaya pemerintah Bekasi dalam menangani permasalahan banjir yang sering terjadi. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode sejarah dengan melakukan pembacaan mendalam berbagai sumber, seperti koran, foto, artikel dan buku. Hasil penelitian menunjukan jika banjir yang terjadi di Bekasi disebabkan oleh tingginya curah hujan, terjadinya alih fungsi lahan secara berlebihan serta ketidakmampuan pemerintah dalam melakukan pengelolaan sumber daya air. Selain itu mitigasi banjir yang dilakukan pemerintah dari masa kolonial hingga masa reformasi masih kurang maksimal. Terbukti dari banjir yang tetap terjadi hingga kini dengan intensitas yang lebih sering. Floods and Bekasi have become two things that are almost impossible to separate. History records that flooding has occurred in Bekasi since the time of the Tarumanegara Kingdom in the 5th century AD which was written in the Tugu Inscription. In colonial times, floods in Bekasi always hit every rainy season. This condition has continued until after the Reformation, even today. The frequent floods that hit Bekasi forced the government in power at that time to find a way to deal with the floods that hit. This paper attempts to describe the history of flooding since the colonial period and to find out how the Bekasi government's efforts to deal with frequent flooding problems. The writing of this article uses the historical method by doing in-depth reading of various sources, such as newspapers, photographs, articles and books. The results of the study show that the flooding that occurred in Bekasi was caused by high rainfall, excessive land conversion and the government's inability to manage water resources. In addition, flood mitigation carried out by the government from the colonial period to the reformation period was still not optimal. This is evidenced by the floods that have continued to occur to this day with more frequent intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it