MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400748319 · doi:10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100093

The Anatomy of Leadership: From Aspirational to Dark Side Leadership Traits

2024· article· en· W4400748319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLeadership and Management in Organizations
Canadian institutionsSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreat RiftPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leadership is all about others on your team and in your organization. Surgical professionals are most likely to follow leaders they trust to care about their professional and personal well-being and are aligned with their values while setting and implementing organizational strategy. Ironically, in order to lead others well, it is best and most effective if leaders are humble, vulnerable, and willing to learn more about themselves, specifically their behavioral tendencies when they both are at their best and when they are under duress. For us as leaders, this includes understanding our own predominant leadership style(s) and learning how to expand our leadership-preferred tendencies to other styles that may be more effective in certain situations. The POSNA Leadership Program enables participants and faculty to study effective leadership principles and theories; evaluate published examples of exceptional and disastrous leadership in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous real-life situations; and have an in-depth dialog on how pediatric orthopaedic surgery leaders can learn from and positively model exemplary leadership characteristics and behaviors. Although our operating rooms, clinics, research, and administrative areas are not battlefields, and we are healers, not warriors, we and the teams we lead do face uncertain, ambiguous, complex, and even volatile situations, often enough to require the implementation of those refined, high-level skills. Key concepts: (1)Like all leaders, surgeons have preferred leadership styles. Learning about, expanding, and adapting leadership style(s) to specific situations is important and impactful.(2)The most effective leaders are humble, have high integrity, think strategically, and are decisive decision makers after input from their trusted professional teams.(3)Trust is the essential ingredient of leading successful teams and organizations. Building trust requires empathy, high task competency, and the ability to actively listen and engage in dialog before and during implementation of plan(s).(4)Volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous dilemmas and challenges occur. Leaders and teams who can manage stress, mobilize necessary resources, and respond in a timely fashion to each volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous situation are most effective.(5)Disruptive behaviors in our profession are more common than ideal. Responding to unprofessional acts, managing perceptions, and redirecting to acceptable behavior lessen safety risks for patients and improve team performance and professional well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it