Lichenicolous fungi and some allied lichens from the Canadian Arctic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forty species of lichenicolous fungi and two allied lichens are reported from the Canadian Arctic, 30 being new to this area.Four species are described as new to science: Lichenochora arctica (on Candelariella canadensis and Rinodina terrestris), L. rinodinae (on Rinodina mniaraea, R. roscida and R. turfacea), Llimoniella catapyrenii (on Catapyrenium cinereum and Catapyrenium sp.) and Opegrapha buelliae (on Buellia insignis).Arthonia almquistii, Cercidospora ochrolechiae, Dactylospora rhyparizae, Didymellopsis pulposi, Lichenochora lepidiotae, Skyttea dacampiae, Stigmidium mitchellii and Zwackhiomyces macrosporus are reported new to North America; Arthonia digitatae, Minutoexcipula mariana and Skyttea dacampiae are reported new to the Arctic; Arthonia digitatae, A. excentrica, C. verrucosaria, Lichenoconium pyxidatae, Merismatium heterophractum, Minutoexcipula mariana, Pseudopyrenidium tartaricola and Zwackhiomyces berengerianus are reported new to Canada.Candelariella, Lecidella, Megalaria and Rinodina are reported as new host genera for Arthonia almquistii, Megalaria for Cercidospora punctillata and Dactylospora deminuta, Protopannaria for Lichenochora lepidiotae, Lecidella for Skyttea dacampiae, Fuscopannaria for Stigmidium mitchellii, Sticta for Stigmidium peltideae and Fuscopannaria for Zwackhiomyces macrosporus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it