Lichenicolous fungi and some allied lichens from the Canadian Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forty species of lichenicolous fungi and two allied lichens are reported from the Canadian Arctic, 30 being new to this area.Four species are described as new to science: Lichenochora arctica (on Candelariella canadensis and Rinodina terrestris), L. rinodinae (on Rinodina mniaraea, R. roscida and R. turfacea), Llimoniella catapyrenii (on Catapyrenium cinereum and Catapyrenium sp.) and Opegrapha buelliae (on Buellia insignis).Arthonia almquistii, Cercidospora ochrolechiae, Dactylospora rhyparizae, Didymellopsis pulposi, Lichenochora lepidiotae, Skyttea dacampiae, Stigmidium mitchellii and Zwackhiomyces macrosporus are reported new to North America; Arthonia digitatae, Minutoexcipula mariana and Skyttea dacampiae are reported new to the Arctic; Arthonia digitatae, A. excentrica, C. verrucosaria, Lichenoconium pyxidatae, Merismatium heterophractum, Minutoexcipula mariana, Pseudopyrenidium tartaricola and Zwackhiomyces berengerianus are reported new to Canada.Candelariella, Lecidella, Megalaria and Rinodina are reported as new host genera for Arthonia almquistii, Megalaria for Cercidospora punctillata and Dactylospora deminuta, Protopannaria for Lichenochora lepidiotae, Lecidella for Skyttea dacampiae, Fuscopannaria for Stigmidium mitchellii, Sticta for Stigmidium peltideae and Fuscopannaria for Zwackhiomyces macrosporus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".