Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in the metaverse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The importance of early diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is by no means negligible because no cure has been recognized for it rather than some therapies only lowering the pace of progression. The research gap reveals information on the lack of an automatic non-invasive approach toward the diagnosis of AD, in particular with the help of Virtual Reality (VR) and Artificial Intelligence. Another perspective highlights that current VR studies fail to incorporate a comprehensive range of cognitive tests and consider design notes for elderlies, leading to unreliable results. METHODS: This paper tried to design a VR environment suitable for older adults in which three cognitive assessments namely: ADAS-Cog, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), are implemented. Moreover, a 3DCNN-ML model was trained based on the corresponding cognitive tests and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with different modalities using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) dataset and incorporated into the application to predict if the patient suffers from AD. RESULTS: The model has undergone three experiments with different modalities (Cognitive Scores (CS), MRI images, and CS-MRI). As for the CS-MRI experiment, the trained model achieved 97%, 95%, 95%, 96%, and 94% in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and accuracy respectively. The considered design notes were also assessed using a new proposed questionnaire based on existing ones in terms of user experience, user interface, mechanics, in-env assistance, and VR induced symptoms and effects. The designed VR system provided an acceptable level of user experience, with participants reporting an enjoyable and immersive experience. While there were areas for improvement, including graphics and sound quality, as well as comfort issues with prolonged HMD use, the user interface and mechanics of the system were generally well-received. CONCLUSIONS: The reported results state that our method's comprehensive analysis of 3D brain volumes and incorporation of cognitive scores enabled earlier detection of AD progression, potentially allowing for timely interventions and improved patient outcomes. The proposed integrated system provided us with promising insights for improvements in the diagnosis of AD using technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".