MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400866332 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108348

Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in the metaverse

2024· article· en· W4400866332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Technology, Patna
KeywordsRecallCognitionModalitiesPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceVirtual realityNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingDiseaseCognitive impairmentPacePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligencePsychologyCognitive psychologyRadiologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The importance of early diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is by no means negligible because no cure has been recognized for it rather than some therapies only lowering the pace of progression. The research gap reveals information on the lack of an automatic non-invasive approach toward the diagnosis of AD, in particular with the help of Virtual Reality (VR) and Artificial Intelligence. Another perspective highlights that current VR studies fail to incorporate a comprehensive range of cognitive tests and consider design notes for elderlies, leading to unreliable results. METHODS: This paper tried to design a VR environment suitable for older adults in which three cognitive assessments namely: ADAS-Cog, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), are implemented. Moreover, a 3DCNN-ML model was trained based on the corresponding cognitive tests and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with different modalities using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) dataset and incorporated into the application to predict if the patient suffers from AD. RESULTS: The model has undergone three experiments with different modalities (Cognitive Scores (CS), MRI images, and CS-MRI). As for the CS-MRI experiment, the trained model achieved 97%, 95%, 95%, 96%, and 94% in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and accuracy respectively. The considered design notes were also assessed using a new proposed questionnaire based on existing ones in terms of user experience, user interface, mechanics, in-env assistance, and VR induced symptoms and effects. The designed VR system provided an acceptable level of user experience, with participants reporting an enjoyable and immersive experience. While there were areas for improvement, including graphics and sound quality, as well as comfort issues with prolonged HMD use, the user interface and mechanics of the system were generally well-received. CONCLUSIONS: The reported results state that our method's comprehensive analysis of 3D brain volumes and incorporation of cognitive scores enabled earlier detection of AD progression, potentially allowing for timely interventions and improved patient outcomes. The proposed integrated system provided us with promising insights for improvements in the diagnosis of AD using technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it