MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400979967 · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.17.1.021

The $g$-function and defect changing operators from wavefunction overlap on a fuzzy sphere

2024· article· en· W4400979967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSciPost Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaGovernment of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsWave functionFunction (biology)Fuzzy logicPhysicsMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defects are common in physical systems with boundaries, impurities or extensive measurements. The interaction between bulk and defect can lead to rich physical phenomena. Defects in gapless phases of matter with conformal symmetry usually flow to a defect conformal field theory (dCFT). Understanding the universal properties of dCFTs is a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a computational strategy applicable to a line defect in arbitrary dimensions. Our main assumption is that the defect has a UV description in terms of a local modification of the Hamiltonian so that we can compute the overlap between low-energy eigenstates of a system with or without the defect insertion. We argue that these overlaps contain a wealth of conformal data, including the g <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> </mml:math> -function, which is an RG monotonic quantity that distinguishes different dCFTs, the scaling dimensions of defect creation operators \Delta^{+0}_\alpha <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> and changing operators \Delta^{+-}_\alpha <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> that live on the intersection of different types of line defects, and various OPE coefficients. We apply this method to the fuzzy sphere regularization of 3D CFTs and study the magnetic line defect of the 3D Ising CFT. Using exact diagonalization and DMRG, we report the non-perturbative results g=0.602(2),\Delta^{+0}_0=0.108(5) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.602</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.108</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and \Delta^{+-}_0=0.84(5) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.84</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for the first time. We also obtain other OPE coefficients and scaling dimensions. Our results have significant physical implications. For example, they constrain the possible occurrence of spontaneous symmetry breaking at line defects of the 3D Ising CFT. Our method can be potentially applied to various other dCFTs, such as plane defects and Wilson lines in gauge theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it