Soils of two Antarctic Dry Valleys exhibit unique microbial community structures in response to similar environmental disturbances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isolating the effects of deterministic variables (e.g., physicochemical conditions) on soil microbial communities from those of neutral processes (e.g., dispersal) remains a major challenge in microbial ecology. In this study, we disturbed soil microbial communities of two McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica exhibiting distinct microbial biogeographic patterns, both devoid of aboveground biota and different in macro- and micro-physicochemical conditions. We modified the availability of water, nitrogen, carbon, copper ions, and sodium chloride salts in a laboratory-based experiment and monitored the microbial communities for up to two months. Our aim was to mimic a likely scenario in the near future, in which similar selective pressures will be applied to both valleys. We hypothesized that, given their unique microbial communities, the two valleys would select for different microbial populations when subjected to the same disturbances. RESULTS: The two soil microbial communities, subjected to the same disturbances, did not respond similarly as reflected in both 16S rRNA genes and transcripts. Turnover of the two microbial communities showed a contrasting response to the same environmental disturbances and revealed different potentials for adaptation to change. These results suggest that the heterogeneity between these microbial communities, reflected in their strong biogeographic patterns, was maintained even when subjected to the same selective pressure and that the 'rare biosphere', at least in these samples, were deeply divergent and did not act as a reservoir for microbiota that enabled convergent responses to change in environmental conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings strongly support the occurrence of endemic microbial communities that show a structural resilience to environmental disturbances, spanning a wide range of physicochemical conditions. In the highly arid and nutrient-limited environment of the Dry Valleys, these results provide direct evidence of microbial biogeographic patterns that can shape the communities' response in the face of future environmental changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".