A燜ault燚iagnosis燤ethod爁or燬mart燤eters爒ia燭wo-layer燬tacking燛nsemble燨ptimization燼nd燚ata燗ugmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accurate identification of smart meter (SM) fault types is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of operation and maintenance (O&M) and the reliability of power collection systems. However, the intelligent classification of SM fault types faces significant challenges owing to the complexity of features and the imbalance between fault categories. To address these issues, this study presents a fault diagnosis method for SM incorporating three distinct modules. The first module employs a combination of standardization, data imputation, and feature extraction to enhance the data quality, thereby facilitating improved training and learning by the classifiers. To enhance the classification performance, the data imputation method considers feature correlation measurement and sequential imputation, and the feature extractor utilizes the discriminative enhanced sparse autoencoder. To tackle the interclass imbalance of data with discrete and continuous features, the second module introduces an assisted classifier generative adversarial network, which includes a discrete feature generation module. Finally, a novel Stacking ensemble classifier for SM fault diagnosis is developed. In contrast to previous studies, we construct a two-layer heuristic optimization framework to address the synchronous dynamic optimization problem of the combinations and hyper-parameters of the Stacking ensemble classifier, enabling better handling of complex classification tasks using SM data. The proposed fault diagnosis method for SM via two-layer stacking ensemble optimization and data augmentation is trained and validated using SM fault data collected from 2010 to 2018 in Zhejiang Province, China. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in improving the accuracy of SM fault diagnosis, particularly for minority classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".