Decentralized UAV Swarm Control: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Integrated Flight Mode Management and Dynamic Target Interception
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed across various domains due to their versatility in navigating three-dimensional spaces. The utilization of UAV swarms further enhances the efficiency of mission execution through collaborative operation and shared intelligence. This paper introduces a novel decentralized swarm control strategy for multi-UAV systems engaged in intercepting multiple dynamic targets. The proposed control framework leverages the advantages of both learning-based intelligent algorithms and rule-based control methods, facilitating complex task control in unknown environments while enabling adaptive and resilient coordination among UAV swarms. Moreover, dual flight modes are introduced to enhance mission robustness and fault tolerance, allowing UAVs to autonomously return to base in case of emergencies or upon task completion. Comprehensive simulation scenarios are designed to validate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed control system under various conditions. Additionally, a feasibility analysis is conducted to guarantee real-world UAV implementation. The results demonstrate significant improvements in tracking performance, scheduling efficiency, and overall success rates compared to traditional methods. This research contributes to the advancement of autonomous UAV swarm coordination and specific applications in complex environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it