The impact of the correlation coefficient of interarrival and service times on queueing performance: The M/M/1 case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned on an M/M/1 queue with correlated interarrival and service times. In particular, we assume that the interarrival time and service time of a customer have a bivariate exponential distribution. By utilizing a Markov modulated fluid flow (MMFF) process associated with the age process of the customer in service, we obtain a number of queueing quantities in closed form. Using the solutions, the impact of the correlation coefficient of the interarrival and service times on a variety of queueing quantities is explored quantitatively and qualitatively. Specifically, we establish a monotonic relationship between the decay rates of queueing quantities and the correlation coefficient of the interarrival and service times. We also show that the decay rates are increasing in the correlation coefficient. In addition, queues with the maximum/minimum correlation coefficient are analyzed. Two examples are presented to demonstrate the importance of using the correlation coefficient in queueing performance/economic analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it